Fractional CTO: Technological Leadership for Your Company

What is it?

A Fractional CTO is an experienced technology leader who works with your company on a full-time basis, but on a part-time basis. You receive strategic guidance that is typically only available to companies with a CTO budget of $200K+ per year, for a fraction of that cost.

This is not consulting or a one-time audit. A Fractional CTO integrates into your team, makes decisions, takes responsibility for results, and builds a system that works without them.

Work Format

  • 2–3 days a week (depending on task intensity)
  • Attends key meetings (planning, architectural discussions, 1-on-1s with leaders)
  • Available for urgent questions between workdays
  • In-person, remote, or hybrid—depending on the company’s needs
  • Monthly progress and priority report for the CEO/founder

Who is it for?

  • Startups post-funding round that need a technology strategy
  • Companies with 10–70 engineers that have “hit a ceiling” in development speed
  • Non-technical founders who need a technology partner
  • Companies preparing for due diligence or the next funding round

Start with a workshop

Many companies start with a workshop. During the process, systemic issues within the organization become apparent — and then the transition to the Fractional CTO model happens naturally, with trust already established and a shared understanding of the context.

Engineering Strategy for Business Leaders
Scaling Engineering: From 10 to 100 Engineers

The Problem This Service Solves

Many companies find themselves in a situation where technology is critical to the business, but hiring a full-time CTO is premature, too expensive, or simply impossible to find the right person. As a result, technology decisions are made “from the bottom up” without a strategy, architecture becomes complex, teams slow down, and the business loses its competitive advantage.

A Fractional CTO bridges this gap: providing the company with strategic technology leadership right now, while the business grows to a level where a full-time CTO becomes justified.

Program

1

Audit of the current state and creation of a strategic plan.

What’s included:

  • In-depth audit: architecture, team, processes, technical debt, delivery metrics
  • Technology status report with prioritized recommendations
  • 12-month strategic roadmap
  • Recommendations on team structure and key hires
  • Implementation of quick wins that deliver visible results within the first few weeks

Result: You have a complete picture and an action plan. You know exactly what to do, in what order, and why.


2

Audit plus implementation of key changes.

Everything from the 3-month package, plus:

  • Restructuring teams to align with business objectives
  • Implementing engineering processes: CI/CD, code review, planning, metrics
  • Making architectural decisions and monitoring their implementation
  • Hiring for key engineering roles (participating in interviews, evaluating candidates)
  • Establishing an operational rhythm: planning, retrospectives, cross-team sync meetings

Result: The team works differently. Delivery speed is measurable and increasing. Processes do not depend on a single person.


3

A full cycle of organizational transformation.

Everything from the 6-month package, plus:

  • Building the management layer: mentoring team leads and engineering managers
  • Implementing OKRs for engineering teams aligned with business goals
  • Aligning architecture and organizational structure (Team Topologies)
  • Creating career paths (IC track and management track)
  • Preparing the organization for 2–3x growth in the number of engineers

Result: The organization is ready to scale. It has leaders, processes, and a culture that can sustain growth.


4

Full transformation with a planned handover to an in-house CTO.

Everything from the 9-month package, plus:

  • Searching for and hiring an in-house CTO or VP of Engineering
  • Mentoring the new technical leader (3 months of working together)
  • Documentation of strategy, processes, and decision-making principles
  • Planned handover with checkpoints

Result: The company is fully self-sufficient. You have an in-house technology leader, a working system, and a documented strategy—not a reliance on an external consultant.


Do you want to get updates about campaigns, discounts and events?